Florida’s highest court upheld the penalty provision in the state’s preemption statute, which holds local officials accountable by directly fining them for knowingly passing preempted ordinances.

Like many states, Florida sought to have a uniform system of firearms laws and passed a preemption statute. But in 2011, after many lawsuits were filed against localities challenging preempted statutes, the state inserted a penalty provision into the statute. Local officials would now be fined up to $5,000 for knowingly passing preempted ordinances with a kicker: “public funds may not be used to defend or reimburse” the official for their unlawful conduct. That provision proved to be effective and largely stopped localities from passing preempted ordinances.

But it left many local officials frustrated. Over 70 of them, along with three counties and 30 municipalities, filed suit challenging the provision. The Florida Supreme Court squarely and unequivocally rejected their claims: “we find no merit in Petitioners’ argument.” But what is telling is that these officials had no qualms about spending public resources, likely in the six-figure range, to take their meritless lawsuit up to the Florida Supreme Court just so they wouldn’t have to personally pay $5,000 for violating state law.

The case was captioned Fried v. State of Florida. The NRA participated as an amicus curiae.

Please stay tuned to www.nraila.org for future updates on NRA-ILA’s ongoing efforts to defend your constitutional rights.

Article by NRA-ILA

Don't forget to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.