NRA Files Amicus Brief with Ninth Circuit in Challenge to California’s One-Gun-Per-Month Restriction.
Today, NRA filed an amicus brief with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Nguyen v. Bonta.
Nguyen is a challenge to California’s law prohibiting the purchase of more than one firearm within any 30-day period.
In March of this year, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California held California’s one-gun-per-month restriction unconstitutional. The State then appealed that decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
- Buy All-American!
- Bring health and vitality back to your body with these non-transdermal patches
- Get your Vitamin B17 & Get 10% Off With Promo Code TIM
- How To Protect Yourself From 5G, EMF & RF Radiation - Use promo code TIM to save $$$
- The Very Best All-American Made Supplements On The Maret
- Grab This Bucket Of Heirloom Seeds & Save with Promo Code TIM
- Here’s A Way You Can Stockpile Food For The Future
- Stockpile Your Ammo & Save $15 On Your First Order
- Preparing Also Means Detoxifying – Here’s One Simple Way To Detoxify
- The Very Best Chlorine Dioxide
- All-American, US Prime, High Choice Grass-Fed Beef with NO mRNA, hormones or antibiotics... ever!
NRA filed an amicus brief with the Ninth Circuit in support of the plaintiffs and affirmance of the district court’s ruling. The brief argues that California’s law violates the Second Amendment because the right to keep and bear arms includes the right to acquire firearms, multiple gun purchases per month were common in early America, and there were no historical limitations on the number of firearms that law-abiding citizens could purchase.
We invite you to read NRA’s brief by clicking here.
Please stay tuned to www.nraila.org for future updates on NRA-ILA’s ongoing efforts to defend your constitutional rights.
Article by NRA-ILA
Don't forget to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
