En Banc Fourth Circuit Upholds Maryland’s Handgun Qualification License Requirement in Challenge
Today, the en banc Fourth Circuit upheld Maryland’s Handgun Qualification License (HQL) requirement in Maryland Shall Issue v. Moore, an NRA-supported case.
To acquire a handgun in Maryland, one must first obtain an HQL. Obtaining an HQL requires taking a four-hour class with classroom and live-fire components, which costs several hundred dollars; undergoing a background check that includes submitting a complete set of fingerprints, which the individual must pay for; paying a $50 application fee; and then waiting up to 30 days for the state to process the application. But obtaining the HQL still does not allow one to purchase a handgun. The individual must then undergo an additional background check, wait seven business days, and pass a NICS check before acquiring the firearm.
In November 2023, a 3-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit held the HQL requirement unconstitutional. But the court then vacated that opinion and agreed to rehear the case en banc.
- Buy All-American!
- Bring health and vitality back to your body with these non-transdermal patches
- Get your Vitamin B17 & Get 10% Off With Promo Code TIM
- How To Protect Yourself From 5G, EMF & RF Radiation - Use promo code TIM to save $$$
- The Very Best All-American Made Supplements On The Maret
- Grab This Bucket Of Heirloom Seeds & Save with Promo Code TIM
- Here’s A Way You Can Stockpile Food For The Future
- Stockpile Your Ammo & Save $15 On Your First Order
- Preparing Also Means Detoxifying – Here’s One Simple Way To Detoxify
- The Very Best Chlorine Dioxide
- All-American, US Prime, High Choice Grass-Fed Beef with NO mRNA, hormones or antibiotics... ever!
In today’s opinion, the en banc court upheld the HQL requirement. The court held that the HQL requirement does not even implicate the Second Amendment because it is a type of “shall-issue” licensing law, and such a law only “infringes” the right to keep and bear arms if it “effectively denies” the right. The court then determined that a delay of the right does not completely deny the right, and therefore the HQL requirement does not infringe—or even implicate—the right to keep and bear arms.
The plaintiffs will now consider whether to petition the Supreme Court to hear the case.
Article posted with permission from NRA-ILA
Don't forget to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.