Kamala Harris finally did her first post-debate interview and got asked preverbal softball questions about GUNS and to expound on her saying she was a gun owner during the debate.

Harris responded with “I am a gun owner and Tim Walz, my running mate, is also a gun owner.

We’re not taking anyone’s guns away. I support the Second Amendment and I support reasonable gun safety laws,” Harris said.

“I feel very strongly that it is consistent with the Second Amendment and your right to own a gun to also say we need an assault weapons ban. They’re literally tools of war,” Harris continued.  “I say we need universal background checks. The majority of NRA members support that. Why? It’s just reasonable. You just might want to know.”

What she didn’t mention is that all of these United States government agencies who are not at war have these types of rifles, but somehow when they’re in the hands of Citizens, they magically morph into “Tools of WAR” designed “to kill a lot of people quickly.”

Now, don’t think for one second that the irony is lost on me that Kamala began by saying she supports the Second Amendment and then the very next thing out of her mouth is proposing a law that literally violates the Second Amendment.

Kamala Harris doesn’t get to decide what does and doesn’t violate the Second Amendment any more than when she was a prosecutor having a criminal tell her which of their criminal actions does and doesn’t violate the law.

That’s not how the Constitution works.

Don't forget to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.