Bill C-71 has been referred to the Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence for review. One source indicates the bill is expected to pass into law by early spring of next year.  

California Congressman Eric Swalwell,  a man who issued a veiled threat of nuking those who would not comply with gun confiscation laws was challenged by Kent State graduate and gun owner Kaitlin Bennett with questions on why he wanted to nuke Americans and if he was actually going to do anything regarding Google censorship.  Watch how fast he runs to the elevator.

The government doesn’t have to prove a crime at all.  They just have to lay out a case of subjective claims that the individual is “dangerous” and shouldn’t have a gun.

Every time rashly adopted “harsher gun laws” cause a manufacturer to impose cutbacks or move, it affects ordinary people’s lives and their ability to earn an honest living.

One Harvard graduate student, whose landlord wanted to kick her out during finals because her roommate’s “feelings are hurt” over her lawfully owned guns.

David Hogg wants a federal tax on firearms and ammunition. He has repeatedly broached the idea, including multiple times on Twitter, and only sometimes suggests a use for the tax revenue. Hogg’s tweets on a federal gun tax include references to implementing the same sort of licensing and permitting requirements …

Huffman told the Washington Post he has concerns someone would be able to gain access to a firearm legally kept in the Capitol and use it for a nefarious act.

While the Democrats’ gun control push will not prevent mass shootings, it will criminalize a grandfather for passing his goose gun to his grandson without government permission. It will also criminalize a mother who gives her college-age daughter a revolver for self-defense without first getting government permission.

Much remains unsettled about the political landscape we will face in the coming two years. But this much is certain—more intense battles over the Second Amendment are in front of us.

Not only was Stevens wrong about the meaning of the Second Amendment.  He’s also wrong that recognition of the individual right has led to negative effects from “increasing gun use in this country.”